September 22, 2005

Like Gold to Airy Thinness Beat

For the last week or so I've felt like my center of gravity has shifted. Just like the compass in John Donne's "A Valediction: Forbidding Mourning" (go here for an adequate explanation of the poem, paying special attention to the last three stanzas (romantic and dirty!)), I feel like I'm leaning away from my fixed point, my nucleus, listing in the direction of a certain someone.

Since first moving to Berkeley in the summer of 2001, I have lived, worked, shopped, dined, gone to the movies, and worked out within the same ten-block radius. Everything I needed (save Krispy Kreme, In-n-Out, and Trader Joe's) was within a fifteen-minute walk of my apartment, and although I've explored the Bay Area by car perhaps more thoroughly than many lifelong residents, my homebase was always Berkeley proper, in the shadow of the campus' campanile.

Now, however, with the love of my life* newly moved into an apartment in Oakland, I don't feel quite at home anywhere. My stuff and my cat are in one place; everything else is where he is, 7.46 miles away according to MapQuest. Thing is, he's closer now than he's ever been, so there's hardly room for complaint. And yet I'd be lying if I didn't admit to feeling a little homesick lately, although for what home I can't exactly say. When we're at my place, we're cramped and the shower sucks. When we're at his place, I can't go five minutes without imagining my bookcase and tv and framed photos filling the few remaining empty spaces. Half of my shoes already litter his bedroom floor, but I want the other half there too.

The good news is that he's happy to have me invade his space. He wants me there, and I feel comfortable and accepted in his home, but even though I am his most welcome guest, I am still and will remain for some time a guest. That makes me feel a little sad. Because I want our physical proximity to mirror our emotional proximity.

But don't get me wrong--I don't want to move in with him tomorrow or anything. (I mean, I would in a heartbeat if he asked me, but that's not how it needs to happen.) I just want to know when. When when when?! Because I can continue living out of my backpack for six months, but not for a year. This may sound like a minor thing for those of you who don't depend on stability and routine and "the plan," but for me it's tremendously stressful to not know where I'm sleeping each night and to have to schedule visits to my cat and decide each morning whether or not I need to take my laptop and blowdrier and makeup bag and clean clothes to work because I don't know where I'll be sleeping on any given night. Short of loading a shopping cart two by two, I don't know how to do this my place/his place thing very well. It just doesn't make sense to my brain and doesn't feel quite right to my heart that we spend every evening together yet continue to pay separate rent and waste gobs of time packing overnight bags and driving twenty minutes to one or the other locale. Things could just be so much easier...

And I feel bad for even bringing this up--not only to you guys but to him--because I have absolutely nothing to complain about. Simon is the most wonderful person I've ever met in my entire life and he has done nothing but make me feel welcome in his home and his life. This "problem" is only 50 percent about our situation, and the rest is about my having once lived with someone who always kept one foot in the proverbial doorway in case he needed to make a quick getaway. Thus it is that whenever I sense a hint of Simon's preferring to be alone rather than with me (and the crazy thing is that this hasn't even really happened yet! I'm just bracing for when it happens in the future because I'm INSANE), I get all weird and self-pitying, and that's no good, not for me, not for him, and not for us. Because if ever a girl felt the most loved and the most secure in her relationship, I am that girl. I have no doubts, not even a little tiny seed of one. And perhaps that's part of the issue--if I know something will happen eventually, I can't help wanting to get there ASAP; I don't really enjoy anticipation, I'd rather just get to it already. That's neither here nor there--it's just different from how he operates.

As if I haven't already said more than enough, let me use an example that does not come from my own experience but is nevertheless apt. Let's say there's a relationship in which one person wants to have sex a lot and the other person doesn't. Instead of compromising--one person has less than he prefers, one person has more than she prefers-- what always ends up happening is that the person who wants to have it less gets her way because, being the equivalent of the "lowest common denominator," she gets to set the pace. And while that makes her happy, that makes her partner miserable. But is that better or worse than a compromise in which both parties give a little? Is it better to have one person content and the other dissatisfied or to have two people who are equally dissatisfied? I don't know. Well, I think my current situation is a bit like that. Whereas I'd like some sort of indication about when I can stop packing an overnight bag every single day, Simon wants to just go with the flow and let things happen when they happen. And I get that and respect it, I really do. Yet while I certainly don't want to force anything or turn into a woman obsessed with a timeline, I can't be completely happy just floating around, anchored to nothing. That's not the type of person I am. But is it wrong to ask him to lay some vague plans with me, or is that outside the realms of acceptable compromise?

I don't even think I'm looking for an answer from you, Internets. Because while this Leah Has a Boyfriend thing is all new to you and you probably want to take me by the shoulders and shake me hard because I'm talking about "the future" with some guy you think I just met and hardly know, please remember that you don't know the whole story. A few little detail nuggets for you: 1. When we switched over to our new computers on Monday, I transfered almost 800 emails that have passed between me and Simon. 2. A big part of why he moved to his new place was so he could be with me. So I hope you don't misunderstand and think I'm totally out of my mind about this stuff. Simon and I have talked about the future, we are deeply committed to each other, and although we're realistic about the possibilities of things going sour, we are confident that this is going to work out just the way we dream it will.

Simon, baby, I don't need to move in with you right now. But I want to feel like we are both working toward it, meaning one of us isn't quite so content with what is quickly becoming the status quo: "Your place or mine?" Does that make sense? I know you're excited about your new place and having the kind of space you've never had, and I know you like me there and want me there, but please, if you can, shift your point of view and join me in looking at this as temporary. Enjoy the hell out of it, and I will too, but let this be a transition and not The Way It Shall Be Indefinitely Amen. I don't want to wait and wait and wait and wait until some outside force initiates a change or you are overcome with a sense of readiness that falls lightly on your shoulders from the ether. I want you to be happy, but I want to be happy too, and the best thing I can do to swing the latter right now is just to ask for what I need. No outrageous demands, no manipulating or whining or pouting, just me asking for a compromise. Six months? Nine months? A year? Should I buy an extra blowdrier and two winter jackets and two boxes of granola bars and should I get a new bureau for my bedroom and fix my place up or just leave it alone because I'll be out of there sooner rather than later? Jeez, why do I have to get so mental and anal about everything when you have been nothing less than a prince?

Let's just say this is a public service announcement to all you guys and girls who have ever felt this way. Because Simon and I don't really have a problem on our hands, here. What we have is a girl who just wants to weave her life more completely with her boy's. And considering that the boy wants that too--just not right now--means that this is a "problem" borne not of dissatisfaction or feelings of inadequacy or insecurity or neglect, but borne of mutual love and desire and goopy, smooshy adoration. I adore the hell out of you, baby, and will wait as long as I need to; just don't expect me to smile through the whole separation, however long it may last, because there's always something missing when you're not next to me.

Posted by Leah at September 22, 2005 11:40 AM
Comments

"Simon and I have talked about the future, we are deeply committed to each other, and although we're realistic about the possibilities of things going sour, we are confident that this is going to work out just the way we dream it will."

That is very profound, but I think that "being confident" isn't enough. You can dream and dream about merging your books together, but unless you talk about them, dream all you like, or you'll begin to wonder if that's all it's going to be. Like in a recent post of mine, when we women were younger, we had time to dream and dream about the future with our guy. But I firmly believe that the only way to brings dreams to fruition is to talk and act upon it.

Talk to him about it. Set some goals. That's not being unrealistic. Unrealistic is to assume and wonder and imagine and regret those goals that did not get reached.

Guys are touchy when it comes to moving in together. Perhaps women adapt to this easier because of the "nesting" syndrome. I told someone recently the goals that I had and that scared them. Too serious? Too soon? The fun is gone when you open that door? On the contrary, having direction lets me ease up even more. I'd rather get the future out in the open than be wound up assuming and waiting months or years. I'm glad I found out now. Now I know where we stand. Like you, I can be patient (with some idea of a timeline). Like Christmas, you know it's coming, you know there's presents, you can wait. But what if there were presents at Christmas, but there was no set date for the big day? We would all have to wait around, wondering, excited about it and scared that it will never come. I don't work that way. I like Christmas when it is. I like moving in when it's time. And there's nothing wrong with having some sort of idea of when your future begins. We MAKE our future.

Posted by: tina at September 22, 2005 12:43 PM

I never had to do the 'your place or mine' thing just due to my own circimstances but I was always afaid of it. How do you decide how often to stay over? Does the double rent thing eventually guilt you into sleeping apart just to feel like you're not wasting money? And the 'his wanting alone time' was a big fear of mine too which is totally stupid because I LOVE alone time. Why does it feel like a rejection when HE wants it? Anyway, my point is...I can really relate to this post. Good luck figuring it out.

Posted by: lainey at September 22, 2005 02:08 PM

Here is what I recommend:

Get militant. Guns, knives, grenades. Show no mercy. Men are feeble and stupid, and understand little besides force, threats, or intimidation.

That is all.

Posted by: jeannie at September 22, 2005 02:23 PM

Your post really resounded with me. I can definitely empathize with some of what you're feeling, the impatience and self-imposed anxiety that comes with being utterly secure and loved by the perfect guy, who I wish I could be near 24/7!

Why IS it that no matter how much we value our alone time, it stings when someone else wants it?

Posted by: mary at September 22, 2005 02:28 PM

Jeannie,

Oh shut up. We're fine. Sheesh.

-Simon

Posted by: simon at September 22, 2005 02:38 PM

Just take it easy and see how things develop. There's no need to make any proclamations, just let things happen, the world has done right by you to this point.

Posted by: Will at September 22, 2005 03:38 PM

oh sweet - a fight between the boy and the commenters

Posted by: chlamygirl at September 22, 2005 04:37 PM

It seems like you're in the position that my beloved and I were in...oh lord...14 years ago. Crap I'm old. Anyway, all I can remember is wanting to move in with him (or, actually, him to move in with me because my apartment was way better) and he just wanted to take it slowly and see what happened.

What happened was that he was accepted to grad school and moving out of the situation he was in became urgent and my MOTHER suggested he move in with me.

We were married a year after he moved in.

He said he woke up one morning and thought, "I can't imagine ever not wanting to be with her." And that was that.

Posted by: suburban misfit at September 22, 2005 04:41 PM

Great post as always! Its great to read Leah in love again, I look forward to watching it work out. Relationships are full of uncertainty, missteps, bliss, joy, and love. It all rolls together into a mixture we can't live without.

Posted by: Rbelle at September 22, 2005 09:53 PM

I always say the same thing to my husband:
"YOU are my home". Because that's the truth of it - it's not apartments that you are discussing, it is the fact that Simon is now your home. If both your homes burnt down tomorrow, you wouldn't care so long as you were both together and safe. So don't worry about the books and the cat - you're already home any time you're together.

Posted by: treefen at September 23, 2005 11:44 AM

Wow, that was incoherent - but I hope you get the gist.

Posted by: treefen at September 23, 2005 11:45 AM

Chlamygirl-

There is no fight between me and Jeannie, although she does tend to be a loudmouthed little stinker (see her frequent comments towards Will for examples). We are not fighting at all, but we do sometimes disagree. The good part is that I know her well enough that we really couldn't fight if we tried. We are very similar, and merely have slight variations on the way we see the world.

It's like two sides to the same coin - we see the world through the same eyes, but don't always interpret it the same... I couldn't fight with her any more than I could fight with myself. We agree to disagree, and we do it in an amicable and pleasant way. Don't we Jeannie? (you miserable little cunt)

Love,
Simon

Posted by: simon at September 23, 2005 12:44 PM

Treefen--Totally got it.

Simon--The C word? Naughty!

Posted by: Leah at September 23, 2005 01:04 PM

Simon,

You miserable little worthless pig. Ha ha ha.

Yes, the internets should know that, as Simon said, we are not fighting - we could never fight. We are able to read each others minds, so there is no reason for us to fight - we already know when we disagree without anyone having to say a word. We are actually quite fond of each other. Any harm I do to him, I do to myself, so we're cool.

Will, on the other hand, I ain't so tight with, so we are always at risk of sliding from witty banter into nasty hurt feelings and animosity. I don't think either of us wants that, though, so Simon, you can stop worrying.

And Leah, you already know how we love the C word. It is so potent, so strong, but when used correctly, so loving.

-Jeannie.

Posted by: jeannie at September 23, 2005 01:10 PM

all i have to say is this: you two will figure it out. i got no advice, nothing for you.

oh, and one other thing. i am happy for you. happy that you have something like this to figure out. aint love grand?

Posted by: Jeorg at September 27, 2005 12:28 PM